Number of items: 3.
Oxford Saïd Research Paper
Sabin, Nicholas and
Reed-Tsochas, Felix
(2018)
Able but Unwilling to Enforce: Cooperative Dilemmas in Group Lending.
Saïd Business School Working Paper.
- Abstract
How does a group’s social structure influence informal sanctioning behavior in cooperative dilemmas? It is generally accepted that the ability to punish non-cooperators increases with greater social connectedness and should improve cooperation. However, this hypothecated ability often does not correspond to the observed collective outcomes. We propose that an important missing factor that can determine collective outcomes is the structural effect on the willingness to punish. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework in which variation in a group’s social structure produces a tension between ability and willingness to enforce sanctions. These tendencies are often in conflict because the same underlying social mechanisms that promote the ability to sanction often decrease the interest in carrying out the punishment. The empirical support for our framework involves an in-depth analysis of group lending in Sierra Leone. Group lending reflects a clear cooperative dilemma: if one member does not repay, the others are held financially responsible. We complement statistical modelling with ethnographic analysis in a nested research design, the highest level including 5,582 repayments made by 1,884 borrowers. Two measures of a group’s social structure, (1) structural cohesion and (2) disconnected subgroups, are examined in light of the ability and willingness to enforce. We find that structural cohesion consistently increases economic cooperation to a point, beyond which unwillingness to punish outweighs the benefits of increased ability, resulting in worse group repayment. Furthermore, groups that consist of disconnected subgroups are more willing to punish defectors in the out-subgroup. However, they are less able to effectively sanction and overall performance suffers. The distinction between ability and willingness allows one to better explain collective outcomes that are non-monotonic and sensitive to interaction effects.
- Item type
- Oxford Saïd Research Paper
- Subject(s)
- Complexity
Social entrepreneurship
- Uncontrolled keywords
- Africa, economy, geography, social capital, social networks, complexity
- Centre
- CABDyN Complexity Centre
![[img]](http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/7036/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/2018-17.pdf)
 Preview |
Sabin, Nicholas
(2016)
Microfinance: A Field in Flux.
Said Business School Working Paper 2016-10.
- Abstract
Modern microfinance, a field reaching over 200 million clients worldwide, is undergoing considerable change. The market structure is shifting with organizations increasingly accessing commercial funding through both private placements and initial public offerings. Some markets have overheated and produced substantial criticism, exemplified by the crisis in Andhra Pradesh, India. Recent impact evaluations of microcredit in diverse countries, such as Bosnia, Mexico, and Morocco, are raising similar questions about what microfinance actually can achieve and how it can best meet the needs of the poor. The basic offering is being rethought in terms of products and services, with increased attention on microsavings, microinsurance, and mobile banking. The field can best be characterized as being in a state of flux, with institutions moving in new and, at times, contentious directions.
This chapter is an overview of the current field of microfinance, drawing on both practitioner and academic resources. Sections 1 and 2 provide a brief introduction and clarification of microfinance terminology. Section 3 places microfinance in its historical context, reviewing predecessors such as informal community associations and state-owned development banks. Section 4 describes how the modern microfinance movement began in the 1970s and grew to its present form. In Section 5, the current landscape is then characterized in terms of scale, geographic coverage, institution size, and organizational type. Sections 6 through 8 summarize the most fundamental ongoing debates in microfinance: the critical features of modern microfinance; the appropriate role of commercialization; and the assessment of microfinance's impact. Sections 9 and 10 conclude with implications for the broader field of social finance based on lessons learned from the microfinance movement to date. Throughout the chapter, vignettes are included to illustrate the trends and concepts.
- Item type
- Oxford Saïd Research Paper
- Subject(s)
- Finance
- Uncontrolled keywords
- finance, microfinance
- Centre
- UNSPECIFIED
![[img]](http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6124/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/2016-10.pdf)
 Preview |
Conference or Workshop Item
This list was generated on Wed Dec 11 03:48:29 2019 UTC.